Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > That said, I agree that it's completely reasonable to have the default > version also `Provides: nodejsXX` and I'll look into it. Provides is something I did not consider at all, and it looks like the easiest way forward! Let me know when you get around to it; alternatively, I can throw together a package PR. > I'm confused; it *is* in addition to the versioned ones. We just don't > duplicate the default version because it would be a complete waste. I meant having both versioned and unversioned packages for the *same* (default) stream available. Probably really overkill if the provides works. > The overly-simplified answer here is mainly that there are too many > symlinks to maintain for this to be practical. Acknowledged; thanks for info. -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jstanek@xxxxxxxxxx irc: jstanek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
