Dear Fabio,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:18 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:06 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 02:35:21PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
(...)
> > As I understand, upstream is going to remove engines but it wouldn't happen
> > before OpenSSL 4.0
>
> That makes sense, as it solves the ELF ABI / SONAME change
> issue with removing the APIs.
>
> > I don't think Fedora should wait for that. We definitely want to land
> > no-engine in RHEL10 so Fedora should be ready for that.
>
> Fedora shouldn't neccessarily be rushed into something just because
> RHEL wants to do it prematurely due to RHEL's long lifecycle.
I fully agree here. Just because something is desirable for RHEL x+1
doesn't mean that it's desirable for Fedora y+1.
Also, hasn't CentOS Stream 10 already been branched off of
ELN-is-Fedora-40, meaning it would be too late if done in Fedora 41
anyway?
I agree that it's not strictly necessary for F41. I'm pretty sure that if we want it in F42 we have to start now.
At least the feedback is valuable and we can take it into account earlier.
Or is this just about OpenSSL maintainers not wanting to have to keep
maintaining Engine support in Fedora while it will be phased out in
RHEL sooner?
Yes. We already have quite bad experience of maintaining slightly different versions of OpenSSL and I'd like to keep the versions as close as possible.
Dmitry Belyavskiy
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
