V Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:33:47AM -0600, Jerry James napsal(a): > Argh, dang time change. I meant to remark on that and obviously > forgot. Yes, libpkgconf 2.1.0 is not ABI compatible with libpgkconf > 1.9.5, but the soname was not bumped. Besides pkgconf itself and > perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf, the build2 and perl-Alien-pkgconf packages > may also need rebuilds. I discovered this issue a week ago. I reported it to the upstream (somebody already posted the link), rebuilt perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf <https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-54844f16d9> and notified build2 maintainers <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267058>. perl-Alien-pkgconf does not need rebuilding because it does not use the shared library. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
