On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:45 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It should also be marked as "retired" / "unmaintained" in Pagure and > there should be no owner which is not the case. And this is not the only > package in this state. I have reported it here: > > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11994 As Miro noted in this ticket, "retired" and "orphaned" are different things. It is a valid state for a package to be "retired" in rawhide but not "orphaned" (i.e. still maintained in stable branches). Packages are only moved to the "orphan" user automatically when they are no longer present in any currently active branches of Fedora or EPEL. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
