Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

Cristian Le via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> · Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:11:08 +0100



    Hi,
    Here's my contribution to this: error upgrading `flang-devel`

      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267221
    On 2024/02/21 8:11, Miroslav Suchý
      wrote:

    
      Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of
        your time and try to run:

        
        # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules

        # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be
        enabled again

        # This is last time we should do that :)

      
       sudo dnf module reset '*'

      
      dnf
            --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \

            --enablerepo=updates-testing \

            $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null
          && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \

          --assumeno distro-sync

        
      This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will
        reveal potential problems. 
      You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
      

      The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not
        make the actual upgrade.
      

      In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the
        appropriate package. 
      Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be
        removed in Fedora 40. Please check existing reports against
        fedora-obsolete-packages first:
       https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
      and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F40FailsToInstall)
        reports:
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2231790&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=13416789
      

      Two notes:
      * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test
        new dnf. Do not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all
        problems.

      
      * this command found several issues on my workstation. One was
        issue with teamd that you will likely hit too:
        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263334
      and there was few other with missing provides/obsoletes that I
        reported. For convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora
        Guidelines:
      https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages

      
      Thank you

      
      Miroslav 

      
      --
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

    
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue