SPDX Statistics - Beginning of the year edition

[Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hot news:

    fedora-license-data has Copr project https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/osci/fedora-license-data where new package is built whenever new PR is merged

    The last phase is ready for wrangler https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 and we will proceed when approved with FESCO.

    I corrected lots of SPDX formula where you used lowercase "and", "or". The specification allows only "AND", "OR". This will likely change in specification version 3, but now the operator has to be upper case.

Two weeks ago we had:

* 23737 spec files in Fedora

* 30335 license tags in all spec files

* 11314 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 5105 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 62,70% ░░░░░░████ 100%

ELN subset:

128 out of 2412 packages are not converted yet (progress 94.69%)

Today we have:

* 23786 spec files in Fedora

* 30396 license tags in all spec files

* 11182 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 5044 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 63,21% ░░░░░░████ 100%

ELN subset:

112 out of 2411 packages are not converted yet (progress 95.35%)

Graph of these data with the burndown chart:

   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing

    The list of packages needed to be converted is here:

    https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt

List by package maintainers is here

   https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt

List of packages from ELN subset that needs to be converted:

   https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/eln-not-migrated.txt

New version of fedora-license-data has been released. With:
    7 new licenses (plus some public domain declarations).
    17 licenses are waiting to be review by SPDX.org (and then to be added to fedora-license-data) https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=SPDX%3A%3Ablocked

    Legal docs and especially

  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/

was updated too.

License analysis of remaining packages: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spdx-reports/

New projection when we will be finished is 2025-02-01 (+17 days from last report).  Pure linear approximation.

    If your package does not have
      neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and
      you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your
      package on ignore list

  https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt

Either pull-request or direct email to me is fine.

Why Beggining of the year? That should be January 1st, right? Before the advent of the Gregorian calendar, March 1st was considered the beginning of the year. Hence Septemeber as the "seventh month" despite the fact it is 9th now. But in the Republic of Venice, for example, March was considered the beginning of the year until 1797. So in Venice, March 1790 < January 1790. For more interesting facts about time (and time zones) see this legendary video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5wpm-gesOY

Miroslav

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue