Build System wrote : > alsa-lib-1.0.10rc1-1 > -------------------- > * Tue Sep 27 2005 Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.0.10rc1-1 > - new upstream version > > alsa-utils-1.0.10rc1-1 > ---------------------- > * Tue Sep 27 2005 Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.0.10rc1-1 > - new upstream version Those version numbers should really be avoided, using the Extras packaging guidelines for instance. This is because for rpm, 1.0.10rc1 > 1.0.10, so it'll be a problem when the final release comes out, unless Epoch is incremented, but that should be avoided as much as possible (by simply being aware of the issue and taking the appropriate measures ahead of time) : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#head-63c1c3d339e145e51777b81c9f9adc8120aa762f Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux kernel 2.6.12-1.1456_FC4 Load : 1.51 0.76 0.51 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
