Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 09:47 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > > > > On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > No match for group package "multican"
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > WTH?
> > > > > 
> > > > > It was a program for controlling Canon cameras that has been
> > > > > retired.
> > > > > Some group you have installed has that package listed in it.
> > > > Ah, this likely explains why neither "dnf repoquery" nor "dnf
> > > > group
> > > > list" could find "multican".
> > > > 
> > > > >   The comps
> > > > > groups need to be cleaned out and that's just a warning.
> > > > Well, ... IMHO, most about comps and groups is in an
> > > > embarrassing
> > > > unusable shape.
> > > > 
> > > No match for group package "baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts"
> > [snip]
> > > No match for group package "util-linux-user"
> > > 
> > > I got these ones , is something on my rpm db ?
> 
> I am seeing these on another machine, too.
> 
> > No.  Well, sort of.  As mentioned, those are packages that have
> > been 
> > removed from the distro, but are still listed in the comps groups. 
> > dnf 
> > checks the installed groups for packages that need to be updated
> > and 
> > can't find these ones.
> Really? How do I check for which groups I have installed?
> 
> At least I haven't found any way to check for them, neither with rpm
> nor 
> with dnf.
> 
> 
> Finally, another issue:
> ...
> Error:
>   Problem: conflicting requests
>    - package libva-intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.i686 from fedora 
> conflicts with intel-media-driver provided by 
> intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree
>    - package libva-intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from
> fedora 
> conflicts with intel-media-driver provided by 
> intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree
>    - problem with installed package intel-media-driver-23.4.3-
> 1.fc39.x86_64
>    - intel-media-driver-23.4.3-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System  does not 
> belong to a distupgrade repository
> (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting 
> packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
> 
> I see 2 potential issues in there:
> 1. I think, I once "dnf swapped" these packages => Does "dnf 
> system-upgrade" handle "swapped" packages correctly?
> 
> 2. Why does dnf system-upgrade wants to pull-in a i686 package in
> this 
> case? IMO, this doesn't make sense.

we are trying fix this one in here :
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6861


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux