John (J5) Palmieri wrote: > A little while ago I was urged by some to include the dbus-qt bindings > in core so that Konqueror could take advantage of HAL. It seems that > the Qt3 bindings are being dropped upstream in favor of the Qt4 > bindings. The thread for this is here: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2005-September/003403.html Uh-oh... > I am therefor dropping the package as there is no maintainer upstream > for it. It has been suggested that Konqueror only uses a small subset > of the bindings and that those portions could be ported to and > maintained in hal-ioslave. If you feel this is important to you I would > file bugs upstream with the ioslave developers and point them to the > above mentioned thread. I'm very surprised the KDE developers don't care that there won't be support for hot-mounting volumes from now on until the 4.0 development cycle ends (and it will likely be over one year). I couldn't find those qt3 bindings mentioned in the thread anywhere in KDE's SVN repository. If there's no replacement, I guess dropping the dbus-qt package would be the only option at this time :-( > I will pull the subpackage next Friday so anyone with packages that > depends on it (which should be few to none since I had just enabled it) > have a weeks reprieve. kdebase tests for the dbus-qt bindings at configure time. If it's not already using it, the spec file may be missing a BuildRequires. -- // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept. \X/ http://www.develer.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
