Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Error:
 Problem: problem with installed package telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc39.x86_64
  - telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System  does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - nothing provides qt6-qtbase(x86-64) = 6.6.1 needed by telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free

On 2024-02-21 08:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:

Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run:

# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
# This is last time we should do that :)

sudo dnf module reset '*'

dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q
fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync


This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems.

You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.


The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade.


In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package.

Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 40. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first:

https://red.ht/2kuBDPu

and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F40FailsToInstall) reports:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2231790&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=13416789


Two notes:

* you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems.

* this command found several issues on my workstation. One was issue with teamd that you will likely hit too:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263334

and there was few other with missing provides/obsoletes that I reported. For convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora Guidelines:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages


Thank you

Miroslav
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux