Re: Does splint work for anyone?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 10:51, David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/15/24 11:19, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 10:15, David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     On 2/14/24 13:32, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 17:17, Ian Laurie <nixuser@xxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:nixuser@xxxxxxxx>
>      > <mailto:nixuser@xxxxxxxx <mailto:nixuser@xxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>      >
>      >     On 2/10/24 05:06, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>      >     >
>      >     > I was trying out the splint program on some code and found
>     that it
>      >     > doesn't seem to work on any recent release due to changes
>     in various
>      >     > header files
>      >     I tried using splint many years ago in connection with embedded
>      >     programming, and even though the GCC based embedded compiler
>     I was using
>      >     was several major version numbers behind what was natively in
>     Fedora, I
>      >     found splint to be hopelessly behind the times and utterly
>     unusable.  I
>      >     don't know why it is even packaged in Fedora.
>      >
>      >     I wish I had the skills necessary to bring it up to date but
>     I don't.
>      >
>      >
>      > Me too. I saw it is FTBFS in F40 and added my data
>      > to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261709
>     <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261709>
>      > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261709
>     <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261709>>
>
>     I got it building and posted a PR:
>     https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/splint/pull-request/1
>     <https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/splint/pull-request/1>
>
>     The upstream project went dormant in 2010, but there are some other
>     semi-active forks.  I don't think that really matters.  The program
>     itself could be useful for research and just as another tool in the
>     toolbox for development.
>
>
> Does it "work?" however.
> ```
> [ssmoogen@toolbox phytool (fix_asprintf)]$ splint +posixlib phytool.c
> Splint 3.1.2 --- 22 Jul 2023
>
> /usr/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:20:24: Parse Error:
>      Suspect missing struct or union keyword: __signed__ :
>      int. (For help on parse errors, see splint -help parseerrors.)
> *** Cannot continue.
> ```
>
> Trying different flags, just got it to find even more 'parseerrors' on
> more and more layers of header files. I could not find any combination
> of flags which didn't result in the program not working with how our
> headers are done in post Fedora 38 (my oldest system).

It depends on what you mean by "work".  It's definitely clear there is a
lot of syntax it does not understand.


It was mainly that I couldn't get it to 'parse' various simple C code without bombing out over standard headers it couldn't parse. I was mainly asking in case you had a standard flag set which made it work and I had missed the obvious.
 
There is at least one fork I found on github that has continued work on
splint, but its most recent commit is from 3 years ago and it has open
issues like "support C99 syntax".


Yeah I could not get the one I found to compile (but it was even older) so not sure where things stood in forks either.
 
splint's days may be over.


I will pour one compile out for it.
 
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux