Am Do., 15. Feb. 2024 um 17:43 Uhr schrieb Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 5:30 PM Michael J Gruber <mjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Yes. That is: running `/usr/lib/rpm/elfdeps --provides` on F39 against >> the two files libmupdf.so.23.10 rpmdev-extracted from the koji scratch >> builds for fc39 and el9 yields >> >> libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) >> >> in both cases. I could try and stuff %__elf_provides into the spec for >> a koji scratch debug run ... > > > Is libmupdf.so.23.10 executable? It used to be the case that the elf depgen only ran on executable files, IIRC. Maybe that has changed in recent Fedoras, but still is the case in el9? Gotcha! You rock! Thanks a bunch. chmod +x'ing should be fine on Fedoras, as well. And from looking at /usr/lib64 it's common anyways. Michael -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
