On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 13:55 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 9/23/05, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Our plan is to move xscreensaver to extras, but allow gnome-screensaver > > and xscreensaver to coexist. We also want to allow to install > > gnome-screensaver + xscreensaver-extras, without xscreensaver-base. > > > > Ray and I figured that we should do the following: > > > > - Remove the xscreensaver-base dependency from xscreensaver-extras (to > > allow xscreensaver-extras to be installed without -base) > > - Remove the xscreensaver provides from gnome-screensaver (to allow > > gnome-screensaver and xscreensaver to coexist) > > > > The second point means that people who upgrade will keep the installed > > xscreensaver around, but we think that is not too bad. We just need to > > figure out how to show only one "Screensaver" preferences menu item. > > Forgetting about the extra complication of having two prefence menu > entries for now.. and just concentrating on the more low level > packaging issues.... > > control-center is going to have to drop the requirement on xscreensaver... > or xscreensaver-base is going to have to drop the obsoletes on xscreensaver... > or both. Oh, I wasn't aware of the xscreensaver requirement in control-center. Ray said nothing depends on xscreensaver... Yes, that needs to go. > That obsoletes in xscreensaver-base is a problem as long as anything > is trying to provide/require xscreensaver. Right. Matthias -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
