Re: exiv2 and protobuf hard to do soname bump without turbulence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Fr., 9. Feb. 2024 um 17:23 Uhr schrieb Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to bring to your attention that Fedora would benefit with
> update of exiv2 [1] and  protobuf [2] but these packages have lots of
> dependencies and the update of the dependent packages is not trivial .
> tips, ideas and opinions ? to do these soname updates
>
> thank you
>
>
> [1]
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/pull-request/6
>
> [2]
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/26

Is the legal question around bff solved?

I guess some time before the mass rebuild would have been a good time
for a major change ...

Michael
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux