I published version 1.2 which doesn't depend on bodhi-client anymore. It is now on PyPI and Bodhi updates are in testing.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:59 PM Jakub Kadlcik <jkadlcik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you for the feedback Stephen,I didn't realize how many and how complicated dependencies the bodhli client package has. It was no problem when installing via DNF but you are right with the pip installation - https://github.com/rpm-software-management/fedora-distro-aliases/issues/3Please subscribe the issue, I will fix it soon :-)On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 8:34 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:32 AM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:58 AM Jakub Kadlcik <jkadlcik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I just wanted to quickly announce a small project I did in collaboration with the Packit folks.
> >
> > Do you have some tools or services that perform actions on all currently active Fedora releases? And do you have to manually update their list every time a new Fedora release is branched or EOLed? The fedora-distro-aliases will make your life easier.
> >
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/fedora-distro-aliases
> >
> > It defines aliases such as `fedora-stable`, `epel-all`, `fedora-latest`, etc. To evaluate them, it queries Bodhi, so they are always up-to-date (but the tradeoff is that it requires an internet connection). There are multiple examples in the project README but the usage is simple, e.g.:
> >
> > >>> from fedora_distro_aliases import get_distro_aliases
> > >>> aliases = get_distro_aliases()
> > >>> [x.namever for x in aliases["fedora-all"]]
> > ['fedora-38', 'fedora-39', 'fedora-rawhide']
> >
> > The package is already in Fedora, give it a shot,
>
> Thanks! I'll look into updating
> https://github.com/sgallagher/get-fedora-releases-action with this.
Scratch that, it appears that `pip3 install fedora_distro_aliases`
requires installing krb5 devel packages (and compiling it) on the
target system before it can be used. This had the effect in my testing
of increasing the time spent running my Action from ~10s to ~240s,
which is too big of an increase. Is there a good reason why you're
using the complete BodhiClient interface instead of just doing simple
HTTP requests against https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases ?
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
