On 1/16/24 15:54, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
On 16/01/2024 23:49, Richard Shaw wrote:On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 5:36 PM Aleksei Bavshin <alebastr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:alebastr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:Ah, I misread the include path. It's our package that is too old :( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/4 <https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/4> should help.It doesn't look like the pull request has gotten any attention. Perhaps it's time to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process?Right because the other two PRs I've merged in the last couple of weeks, including one today, are not evidence of responsiveness? That PR is on my to look at list but rather obviously it needs more work than the other ones. I'm not really keen on packaging a random git snapshot because there's no way to know how good or bad it is but I realise that due to upstream being a pain it may be necessary here.
For a conservative approach, cherry-picking 3b2441b, 862c39b, 24ebd51, 64faab2, a98e999 seems to be enough. The first 2 commits take care of the issue from this thread, and the remaining 3 are needed to support using rapidjson from projects with -std=c++20.
Tom
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
