On 08-01-2024 17:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 16:10 +0000, Aoife Moloney wrote:
I'll get the EOL-close script running again, it kept timing out so I
thought it was finished but clearly not - my mistake and apologies :-/
Just so folks are aware, the EOL closure uses a script:
https://pagure.io/fedora-pgm/pgm_scripts/blob/main/f/closebugs/fedora_bz.py
which runs bug-by-bug - so it comments on, or closes, one bug at a
time. This means it takes a very long time to do the ~2-3k bugs that
are typically commented-on then closed at EOL time.
Doing it this way was Ben's preference (he wanted to be able to see
that every bug was updated and get a notice from the script for any
single bug change that failed), but if it causes problems for Aoife we
can have it mass-update bugs instead, since Bugzilla and its API allow
that (now, they probably didn't when the predecessors to this script
were written). I'll just have to check with the BZ admin whether
there's any upper limit on how many bugs you can request a mass change
to at once.
I just noticed that some bugs with version '37' were still open while
others were already closed.
I think it makes perfect sense to do a mass update to the extend
possible to have this process finish quicker. It's fairly easy to query
for bugs that may have been missed afterwards. That's essentially what I
did with my query.
You may also have to check with mail admins, because it might break the
levees of the mail river doing a mass update, I could imagine.
-- Sandro
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue