Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/27/23 17:10, pgnd wrote:
If it works, I'd still wonder why md54 comes up fine. That entry is also missing `level` and `num-devices`.

1st WAG ?

WAG?

/dev/md/54 is 'just' raid1, without an atypical spare

It's not. It's a raid5 without any spare just like md5. Only difference between the two is the metadata version, 1.1 vs. 1.2. And the partitions making up md54 have a bunch of additional entries like UUID_SUB as reported by `blkid`. More details in the discussion post.

raid5 & raid1+spare are less common.
whether autoassembly is smart enough to pick up the diffs without the explicit spec in /etc/mdadm.conf?
again, dunno without trying.

I added `level` and `num-devices` to all entries in mdadm.conf and rebooted. It didn't change anything. Manual assembly still freezes the system as well.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux