On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 07:04:03PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 09. 12. 23 v 12:57 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > > It was my understanding the switch to dnf5 was delayed until F-41 so I > > don't think we should be using it for this either until it's the > > default in Fedora as well. > > It was delayed because it was not ready for general usage. E.g. some > functionality were missing. But most of the functionality is there for > loooong time. One of the missing piece is 'system-upgrade' command. Do you > need it for creating iso image? No. Are you missing something else? If not > then I encourage to try using DNF5 for your workflow. You may discover some > issue that stops you. But sooner you discover it, sooner the DNF will fix > it. … and to clarify: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildWithDNF5 was approved for F40 *after* we did the postponment of Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5 to F41. It only makes sense because we didn't do the replacement everywhere. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
