Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
On 18/09/05, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PyQt wouldn't depend on PyQt-qscintilla. It's the other way around: PyQt-qscintilla would Requires: PyQt. And, eric would Requires: PyQt-qscintilla (So there's no need to PyQt to Extras for PyQt-qscintilla's or eric's sake)
Not quite as simple. PyQt-qscintilla is built as part of PyQt -- it's not a separate package. I *could* provide PyQt-qscintilla in extras, leaving PyQt in core, but that would require: 1. fully mirroring the SRPM with the one from Core, just to add the qscintilla bits 2. constantly coordinating with the PyQt in Core to make sure we don't diverge That's really not efficient. It'd be far more so to have both PyQt and Qscintilla (parts of the same project, really) in the same repository.
I undetstand all that, however, what you suggest is not possible for anything < FC5, so I'd suggest trying to make do as best you can (ie, packaging only PyQt-qscintilla) if you have any intention of supporting anything <= FC4.
-- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
