Re: Unofficial FC4.1 i386 isos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 17 September 2005 05:33, Warren Togami wrote:
> http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/1398/
> As for the kernel I personally think 1398 is far less problematic for
> most folks than 1447.  I copied all of the 1398 kernels for you here
> if you want to try that instead.  Or maybe you should wait for a
> better new FC4 update kernel to hit the official tree.

If it's that bad, why didn't we rollback to 1398 after the discovery of 
badness?

-- 
-jeff

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux