On 15. 11. 23 16:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Am Mi., 15. Nov. 2023 um 15:31 Uhr schrieb Priscila Gutierres
<prgutier@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:prgutier@xxxxxxxxxx>>:
I would like to maintain it, but I'm now just a contributor
Can someone please sponsor me to allow me to become a maintainer and take
this package?
Priscila.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:41 AM Tomáš Orsava <torsava@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:torsava@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi,
I just orphaned pipenv: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pipenv
<https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pipenv>
I haven't been using the package for some time, and upstream releases
versions too fast for me to keep up. Also I'm not sure how many people
use the package.
There are two open BZs for the package, but they'll likely be resolved
by updating to the latest upstream version.
Tomas
Looking at the myriad of py packages which Fedora's pipenv bundles, I'm really
wondering whether we should package this at all, at least in this form. I'm not
saying that unbundling is easy or even feasible.
We used to unblundle it. It didn't work. We added the bundled things back one
by one until we gave up.
The packaged pipenv is broken on Fedora 38 and Fedora 39 and nobody seems to be
screaming about it. I think we should let it die.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue