I believe that one of the strong complains was related to not signed packages. The use case is that when I build RPMs locally and then I install them (see bellow). dnf install *.rpm --setopt=localpkg_gpgcheck=true ... Package dnf-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed Package dnf-automatic-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed Package dnf-data-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed Package python3-dnf-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed Package yum-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed Error: GPG check FAILED Jaroslav _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
