On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 6:28 PM Julian Sikorski <belegdol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 06.11.23 um 17:17 schrieb Michael J Gruber: > > > > > > Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Fabio Valentini > > <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx>>: > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:09 PM Julian Sikorski <belegdol@xxxxxxxxx > > <mailto:belegdol@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have accidentally built f39/rawhide branch of gnumeric and > > > gnome-chemistry-utils for f38 and f37 side tags (f39 too but > > rawhide and > > > f39 are the same commit). Can this be fixed? Or is the effort not > > worth > > > it? Thanks. > > > > Are the contents of the package the same except for the changelog > > entries / Release field? > > Then I would not bother trying to fix it. > > > > It is kind of unfortunate that koji does not have guardrails in place > > to prevent building branch X against target Y!=X, but that's probably > > something that actually needs to work for Modularity or other > > configurations ... > > > > Fabio > > > > The spec files differ in content (as far as flatpaks are concerned). But > > since this package uses separate branches without forwards/merges but > > cherry-picks only, i.e. clearly separates branches in git, it would be > > surprising not to care about the branch now ... I guess git branches are > > still somewhat foreign to how we drive our dist. > > > > Michael > > > > Hello, > > for gnome-chemistry-utils, the differences are only with release field > and changelog. For gnumeric, f37 has a slightly different > desktop-file-install call in addition. > I would prefer to fix it properly. Due to fewer mass rebuilds older > gnome-chemistry-utils branches should have lower release than the newer > ones. If the problem remains unfixed, I would have to bump the release > to make sure the numbers don't go backwards. For gnumeric this is a bit > less of a problem since there are new versions still being released so > release number would reset soon-ish anyway. > I tried untagging the erroneous builds with > $ koji untag-build > While it worked, I was not able to rebuild from correct branches because > koji was complaining that a build already exists: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108660999 > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108661023 > > Can I request to have the builds removed so that they can be rebuilt > from correct branches? No, NVRs for successful builds are unique in koji. The only way to resubmit something that already succeeded is to bump release. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
