On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 16:23:41 +0100 Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would would like to hear your opinion: Should DNF5 start verifying > all packages? Should DNF5 keep ignoring signatures for > out-of-repository packages? Or should rather narrow the verification > skip to packages from a local file system? Any other options? I build a local kernel from the src.rpm, and install it with dnf -C install [etc.] I never see this warning (dnf4). Would I start seeing it with dnf5? It is easy enough to add the --no-gpgchecks option if it is required, and it seems like a good reminder that the package being installed might be a security risk. Though, in my specific case, that isn't true if the fedora src.rpm is valid. A pretty safe bet. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
