Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>There are arguments
> about whether it's appstream-builder specific (given that Debian's
> archive is bigger, their package format is more complex to "pluck"
> from, etc and appstream-generator does fine there), but the point is
> that for Fedora with appstream-builder, it's too slow. Note that the
> context of this is back in the era where Fedora composes took half a
> day or longer. Adding even more hours to that process was not
> appealing (it would have to be done for every repo being composed for
> every architecture...).

So, if it's theoretically possible to be much faster than it is, has anyone sat down with a profiler and tried to improve appstream-builder?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux