On pátek 30. prosince 2022 20:01:55 CEST Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved > by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. > > == Summary == > Rpmautospec (`%autorelease` and `%autochangelog`) is recommended as > the default approach. > Packaging Guidelines and other documentation are adjusted to describe > this approach first. > Various tools that provide spec file templates are adjusted. While on it, could we please make %changelog optional? Packaging become an automatized task, and maintainers don't pay attention to %changelog beauty so they simply generate it from git-log (but I'd claim that git-log != %changelog). Seems that %changelog become one of the most painful maintainers' headache :) What do you think about a static changelog like: %changelog * See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/<PKG>/commits/rawhide Aren't we ready to admit (something like) this is enough? Pavel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
