Re: Fedora Linux 39 Final blocker status summary #3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> Personally, I have been using systemd-timesyncd for
> quite some time on the vast majority of my systems
> and am quite satisfied with it, but I believe that
> changing from chrony to systemd-timesyncd was
> considered too big of a last minute change since
> we are in the final blocker stage of a release.

Certainly - I was just looking for a more general solution to non-RTC
systems going forward.  Ideally, there could be something triggered by a
lack of an RTC, but it looks like systemd path units cannot work based
on a path (e.g. /dev/rtc) _not_ existing.  That's unfortunate, that
would make it easy.

-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux