On 18. 10. 23 9:35, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
Dear Miro,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:33 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 16. 10. 23 14:19, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
Why is it too late for F-40? Do you mean F-39?
Thanks!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveOpensslCompat
Could you please update the contingency plan section?
"Package owners should update their packages to remove the dependency" is not a
contingency mechanism.
I think we don't have a reason to maintain openssl1.1 anymore.
Formally I can suggest turning openssl1.1 back to distro as a
contingency plan, but it doesn't look reasonable to me.
Well obviously activating a contingency plan is not what the change owners
want, but I believe it's something they should be prepared to do in unforeseen
circumstances. Having it documented allows *others* to do it in case the change
owners walk away.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
