Re: status openssl1.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18. 10. 23 9:35, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
Dear Miro,

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:33 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 16. 10. 23 14:19, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
Why is it too late for F-40? Do you mean F-39?

Thanks!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveOpensslCompat

Could you please update the contingency plan section?

"Package owners should update their packages to remove the dependency" is not a
contingency mechanism.

I think we don't have a reason to maintain openssl1.1 anymore.
Formally I can suggest turning openssl1.1 back to distro as a
contingency plan, but it doesn't look reasonable to me.

Well obviously activating a contingency plan is not what the change owners want, but I believe it's something they should be prepared to do in unforeseen circumstances. Having it documented allows *others* to do it in case the change owners walk away.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux