Re: SPDX Statistics - Miracle of the Sun edition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/13/23 08:15, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hot news:

There was new release of SPDX License list. If you want to see impact of Fedora work you can check number of new licenses in recent releases and compare

https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases

and compare it with content of the releases before we started migrating packages (~ Nov 2022) i.e. version 3.19.

Reviewers wanted: Package review of scancode-toolkit still need 3 dependencies to be review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235055

Now lets dive into numbers:

Two weeks ago we had:

* 23100 spec files in Fedora

* 29479license tags in all spec files

* 12870 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 5817tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 56.34% ░░░░░█████ 100%

ELN subset:

913 out of 3957 packages are not converted yet


Today we have:

* 23188 spec files in Fedora

* 29635license tags in all spec files

* 12724 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 5742tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 57.06% ░░░░░█████ 100%

ELN subset:

490 out of 3139 packages are not converted yet

Graph with the burndown chart:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing

The list of packages needed to be converted is here:

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt

List by package maintainers is here

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt

List of packages from ELN subset that needs to be converted:

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/eln-not-migrated.txt

New version of fedora-license-data has been released. With 15 new licenses (plus bunch of public domain declarations). 15 licenses are waiting to be review by SPDX.org (and then to be added to fedora-license-data) https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=SPDX%3A%3Ablocked

Legal docs and especially

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/

was updated too.


New projection when we will be finished is 2024-08-23.  Pure linear approximation.

If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt

Either pull-request or direct email to me is fine.


I'm updating Clementine to SPDX, with full reanalysis of the project:

# Apache-2.0:
#   - ext/libclementine-common/core/latch.cpp
#   - ext/libclementine-common/core/latch.h
#   - ext/libclementine-remote/remotecontrolmessages.proto
#   - ext/libclementine-common/core/logging.cpp
#   - ext/libclementine-common/core/logging.h
#   - ext/libclementine-common/core/messagehandler.cpp
#   - ext/libclementine-common/core/messagehandler.h
#   - ext/libclementine-common/core/override.h
#   - ext/libclementine-common/core/timeconstants.h
# BSL-1.0: 3rdparty/utf8-cpp
# GPL-2.0-or-later:
#   - src/engines/gstengine.cpp
#   - src/engines/gstengine.h
#   - src/widgets/sliderwidget.cpp
#   - src/widgets/sliderwidget.h
# LGPL-2.0-or-later:
#   - gst/moodbar/gstfastspectrum.cpp
#   - gst/moodbar/gstfastspectrum.h
# LGPL-2.1-only:
#   - 3rdparty/taglib
#   - src/widgets/stylehelper:
# LGPL-2.1-only WITH Qt-LGPL-exception-1.1 OR GPL-3.0-only:
#   - 3rdparty/qsqlite/clementinesqlcachedresult.cpp
#   - 3rdparty/qsqlite/clementinesqlcachedresult.h
#   - 3rdparty/qsqlite/qsql_sqlite.cpp
#   - 3rdparty/qsqlite/qsql_sqlite.h
# LGPL-2.1-only WITH Qt-LGPL-exception-1.1 OR LGPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-LGPL-exception-1.1:
#   - 3rdparty/qsqlite/smain.cpp
#   - 3rdparty/qsqlite/smain.h
# MIT: 3rdparty/qocoa
License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND BSL-1.0 AND LGPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-only AND Apache-2.0 AND (LGPL-2.1-only WITH Qt-LGPL-exception-1.1 OR GPL-3.0-only) AND (LGPL-2.1-only WITH Qt-LGPL-exception-1.1 OR LGPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-LGPL-exception-1.1) AND MIT
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux