On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 09:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > Could I, possibly, temporarily drop support for aarch64 in the spec file for 5.9 so all versions of x86_64 can get it, and then re-enable it for if/when I figure out what’s going on with the aarch64 version? Please don't do this. It's very unfriendly to the other arch. In case you're not aware, if you do this, the arch does not keep the previous version of the package in its repo - the package disappears from the repo entirely. For stable releases this isn't *so* bad because it's at least still present in the frozen release repo, but for development releases, that means the package is completely gone from that release for new installs. aarch64 is one of our primary arches. If a package is in Fedora and not clearly entirely useless on that arch, it should build for that arch, and if it doesn't, that needs to be fixed. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
