On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:08:57 -0600 Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:03 AM Lyes Saadi <lyessaadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I have a noarch package which faces an issue with one of its arches > > (s390x), and which happens to have multiple noarch packages depending on > > it, and they won't build either if they were built on that same arch > > (but, they will still work normally when installed on that arch). And > > so, I plan on adding an ExcludeArch, as per > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_arch_specific_runtime_and_build_time_dependencies. > > > > But, I don't know if I need to also ask maintainers of every dependency > > to add ExcludeArch themselves. Indeed, the guideline says : > > > You can limit both the architectures used to build a noarch package, > > *and the repositories to which the built noarch package will be added* > > > > So, am I correct in assuming that if my noarch package uses ExcludeArch, > > every other dependent package, when building, will not build on that > > Arch as well ? > > You will indeed have to ask the maintainers of consuming packages to > add that ExcludeArch too. What package is it and what is the nature > of the problem on s390x? Maybe it can be fixed. I believe it's about blueprint-compiler, which has some big endian issues, please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169892 Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
