Re: Comments on X.Org X11 modularization project - rpm package driver naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 9/12/05, Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry for missing the August 29th deadline...  Hopefully better
late than never.

While I agree that moving to separate packing of the X drivers
is a good thing, I'm wondering if we don't need to release the
X server (as Xorg or Xfree86 or whatever) as a separate entity
as well, as in the case where additional functionality has been
added to support new driver features, or the server API has
changed internally.

Just an observation.

Would the X server proper, the Mesa and DRM/DRI drivers,
etc. continue to be released as part of the "xorg-x11" (tout
court) package?  Or am I missing something?


Everything is being split out into separate packages to make it easier to release updates to individual packages and to allow each package to devel at its own pace. This includes not only drivers but things such as mesa and other packages, libraries etc. More info can be found at the x.org wiki covering the modularization here http://wiki.x.org/wiki/ModularizationProposal

Pete

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux