Re: PDC replacement proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 16:51 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> 
> Current uses of PDC:
> 
>    1.
> 
>    Critical Path Package Tracking: Bodhi leverages PDC to track packages on
>    the critical path.
> 
> /rest_api/v1/component-branches/: Specifically, Bodhi will handle the
> critical-path flag.
> 
> Bodhi's existing framework aligns well with releases and components. To
> enhance this, we will create an auxiliary table that pairs this data with
> additional metadata,
> 
> predominantly focusing on the critical-path flag. Previously, we had to
> query this information from PDC.
> 
> It's essential to note that PDC is not the definitive source of truth for
> critical-path packages. The Fedora Project Critical Path Package Wiki
> indicates that the source of truth lies within the Fedora Comps repository.
> 
> You can find specific information by searching for groups with the
> "critical-path-*" prefix, as demonstrated here.
> 
> While the data is accessible through DNF, generating it can be
> time-consuming. PDC serves as a pre-computed cache.
> 
> Previously, we followed this process to update it, but now we have
> transitioned to using this method.
> 
> The primary application of this information during the Fedora release cycle
> is in Bodhi, where it is used to enforce stricter requirements on
> critical-path package updates. For further details, please refer to this
> link.

This is all done already. I did it months ago:

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4755
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4759
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1294
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/c/fea60aab95bd45960dbf4a0514c5df28a86090eb?branch=main
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/c/842db118e88b987dbb5ab98f4d17556aba0601d6?branch=main

We no longer use PDC for critical path information and, indeed, we
dropped the code for doing so from Bodhi last month:

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/5431

BTW, the email seems kind of weird. There are lots of places where it
seems like it's referring to external information - "as demonstrated
here", "Previously, we followed this process to update it, but now we
have transitioned to using this method" - but it does not actually link
to anything external, so I have no idea what the references are meant
to be?
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.happyassassin.net



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux