Hello, On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 2:27:40 PM EDT Steven Presti wrote: > * New Package Request: audit (spresti, 17:04:16) > * LINK: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1362 > (spresti, 17:04:29) > * LINK: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audit/blob/rawhide/f/audit.spec#_20 > (travier, 17:10:28) > * LINK: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audit/blob/rawhide/f/audit.spec#_152 > (dustymabe, 17:12:01) > * LINK: > > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1362#issuecomment-1 > 690335372 (travier, 17:13:10) > * AGREED: We'll fix the remaining issues in the audit package and > we'll include it in Fedora CoreOS once ready (spresti, 17:17:40) Out of curiosity, is this being done in the context of F39 or F40? The reason I ask is that a big change is in the works for the audit system for F40. I was waiting for the F40 Change Proposal cycle to be open before saying anything. Basically it amounts to separating augenrules/auditctl into it's own service to load audit rules which the auditd service will depend on. This way people happy using journald for audit logs can avoid installing the audit package. This will need extra eyes - hence it will go through the Change Proposal process to ensure it works well. So, if this is in the context of F40, it may warrant another look at the plans. -Steve _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
