In one week, 2023-08-29, I plan to update llhttp from 8.1.1 to 9.0.1 in
F40/Rawhide[1]. This update contains some breaking API changes and
breaks the ABI, bumping the SONAME version[2][3]. Most significantly,
the compile-time LLHTTP_STRICT_MODE option is replaced with three new
runtime flags.
The sole dependent package is python-aiohttp; I will rebuild it myself
in a side tag, using a patch for llhttp 9.x support backported from an
unreleased upstream commit[4].
I don’t plan to apply the python-aiohttp patch and the llhttp 9.0.1
update to F39 at this time, with the understanding that this will
constrain future python-aiohttp updates in F39: I would prefer to avoid
getting ahead of upstream. I might reconsider this if an upstream
release of python-aiohttp using llhttp 9.x happens by the end of the
beta freeze, or if someone convinces me that keeping llhttp at 8.1.1 is
the wrong approach. Input is welcome.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llhttp/pull-request/15
[2] https://github.com/nodejs/llhttp/releases/tag/release%2Fv9.0.0
[3] https://github.com/nodejs/llhttp/releases/tag/release%2Fv9.0.1
[4] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-aiohttp/pull-request/27
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
