Re: Dropping of sshd.socket unit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 08:25:10AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > Yes, and if this is not what you want, then disable the
> > ratelimit. That's what I am saying?
> 
> It would be useful for systemd to have "cooldown periods" for things,
> similar to inetd and classic init, where misbehaving things (whether
> services or sockets) were paused for a time (configurable even) and then
> returned to service.  AFAIK this is a flaw in general in systemd's
> limits; if something exceeds them, it takes manual intervention to reset
> them.

  Very recent systemd versions have exponentially-growing restart intervals.
I guess you can use very large limit for number of restart, and use
RestartSteps=/RestartSecMax= to make "cooldown periods".

-- 
Tomasz Torcz                 Morality must always be based on practicality.
tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx                 — Baron Vladimir Harkonnen
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux