On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 9:47 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Dne 27. 07. 23 v 22:23 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Samantha Bueno <sbueno@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora > >>> 39 and, perhaps notably, Fedora 40 as well. > >> For those of us who upgraded to DNF05 in rawhide to test it, is there a > >> quick reference for our paths forward? Er, backward? I upgraded at the > >> wrong time and spent half a day recovering my system, I'd rather avoid > >> that if I have to go back to DNF04... > > I would expect a revert back to where /usr/bin/dnf is dnf4 (but > > hopefully dnf5 is still available/seperate). > > > Please note that this is not just about changing where /usr/bin/dnf > points to. I was unpleasantly surprised that DNF5 is using different > locations for data cache and there is no migration path back and forth, > which leaves some unattended directories behind. I am very grumpy about > this, because the cache is invaluable on Rawhide being sometimes the > only (or at minimum the easiest) way to revert to older package in case > of troubles. In that sort of usecase it's a once off change when you move back to dnf4, you can always grab rpms manually either from the remaining dnf5 local cache or worst case from koji. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
