On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 2:23 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Samantha Bueno <sbueno@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora
> > 39 and, perhaps notably, Fedora 40 as well.
>
> For those of us who upgraded to DNF05 in rawhide to test it, is there a
> quick reference for our paths forward? Er, backward? I upgraded at the
> wrong time and spent half a day recovering my system, I'd rather avoid
> that if I have to go back to DNF04...
I would expect a revert back to where /usr/bin/dnf is dnf4 (but
hopefully dnf5 is still available/seperate).
Hopefully that can happen before branching in a few weeks.
With the intention of carrying two versions side by side for a while longer, does it make sense to use alternatives for this?
It might be more work than it's worth. However, it would be nice to have `dnf4`, `dnf5` and `dnf` commands all available with the default easily configurable.
Jonathan Steffan
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
