On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:22:36PM +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 07:26 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 12:28:46PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > > > Daniel Veillard wrote : > > > > Then reboot ... 2.6.13-1.1538_FC5 still fails to boot all process forked > > > > by init just seems to crash, but booting the old 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 works. > > > > Half a day later I still don't have a setup to test inotify or recent Xen. > > > > > > Current Rawhide kernels are broken. See Dave's earlier email to the list : > > > > Can't basic bootup of kernels on i386 uniproc machine be tested before > > pushed to rawhide, channels, mirrors and users ? > > This kernel has only been half broken. For many it has been working, > for others it hasn't. So I'm just being unlucky there ? that's possible, 2.6.13-1.1542_FC5 fixes it as I tested which is a good point. > Dave's had a little difficulty rebasing to 2.6.13, but given the amount > of effort he puts in I wouldn't even think of blaming him for not > testing the kernel on all the different possibilities. I though the problem was more common. Testing all possibilities sure can't be done ahead, that would be a radical change of model. > In the past four or five days, we've had the first three 'broken' > kernels of the rawhide series. You've unfortunately just hit a rough > patch. okay, I'm being unlucky ... but running i686 on a dell laptop doesn't sounds like a setup which should expose weird cornercase behaviour :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
