On 25-07-2023 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote:
21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed builds
that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be
filed shortly.
Will all the Python packages that failed during the Python3.12 mass rebuild
and haven't been fixed yet, receive another FTBFS/FTI bug? Or will those be
filtered out?
If they already have a FTBFS bug (attached to the tracker) they will not
get a new bug. If they do not, they will. :)
Well, the first batch of bugs for the Python3.12 mass rebuild were
mostly FTI bugs, even though some of them turned out to be in fact FTBFS.
Since FTI and FTBFS use separate tracker bugs, I/we now have two
different bugs pointing at the same issue:
FTI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220504
FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226331
I also noticed that the FTBFS bugs filed after the f39 mass rebuild have
log files attached. While not harmful, wouldn't it be better to just
link to the failed build in Koji, that has all the logs for all the
archs stored anyway? Especially since large log files are truncated.
-- Sandro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
