* Josh Boyer: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote: >> > * Miro Hrončok: >> > >> >> glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub, mcermak >> > >> > Is this about FTBFS issues? There isn't any recent build failure in >> > Koji, so I don't get why it's on this list? >> >> The build currently in Rawhide was done on Fedora 36 which is end of life. >> >> Apparently the release engineering team has not rebuilt this package in a mass >> rebuild at least since Fedora 35. >> >> To remove it from the list, build the package on Rawhide please. > > Or we could not, and drop i686 completely. If we drop glibc32, we can't build any 32-bit code at all because GCC will no longer support -m32. In this regardm x86-64 is different than the other Fedora architectures which can target bare metal 32-bit even from 64-bit-only compilers. Are bootloaders fully treated as firmware and no longer built by Fedora? At least the shim package does not come with corresponding source code AFAICS. But I expect that there are other 32-bit pre-boot packages that we still rebuild. We need to fix this GCC build issue for CentOS 10 eventually, and at that point, we won't need glibc32 anymore. It's been a constant source of annoyance. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
