On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 2:03 AM Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ben Cotton wrote: > > This will be helpful to people who aren't regularly involved in FESCo > > votes. If that's you: the proposal presented here is largely > > clarification. There's not much in the way of substance change. > > Actually, it changes existing practice in that it changes the meaning of the > "0" vote. Thanks for pointing that out. You're right, that part does represent a change in substance, but in a relatively rare case, which is why I said "not much". (I have a sense that the current rule wasn't consistently applied during my time as FPgM, but I don't want to do the archaeology to find out.) To be fully transparent, the reason I said that at all was to mitigate potential "FESCo voting rules are changing in the next big step towards IBM's destruction of all things community" FUD. It's been a silly enough time to be online the last few months already. -- Ben Cotton (he/him) TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bcotton _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
