Re: fedora-review workarounds for dnf5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> Hello Jerry,
> I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
>
> but your patch looks like a proper fix. I'll try it and merge to the
> fedora-review codebase.
>
> Does anybody know what was the purpose of --resolve and if it will be
> no problem when we remove it?

--requires --resolve resolves the entire dependency tree of a package.
--requires just prints the direct dependencies that are specified in the
RPM metadata.
I don't know what this code is used for,
but I don't think simply removing --resolve is the right solution.

-- 
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux