Re: Several questionable packages installed on fresh system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 13 July 2023 at 14:42, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 13. 07. 23 v 14:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Dne 10. 07. 23 v 10:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > > exiv2
> > > 
> > So this is pulled in by exiv2-libs:
> > 
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/blob/rawhide/f/exiv2.spec#_53-58
> > 
> > I am not sure I agree with the comment `# not strictly required, but
> > convenient and expected`. But I think dependencies like this should
> > be reevaluated at least in the install media context. This would
> > save 4+ MB of space.
> > 
> > Or is the exiv2 maintainer (in CC) going to revisit this dependency?

I agree that -libs should not require or even weak-depend on the main
package.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
        -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux