On 11. 07. 23 12:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 07. 23 10:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
I have recently installed Fedora Rawhide via netinstall and there are some
questionable packages installed by default, such as:
...
libxcrypt-compat
...
and I wonder what is the mechanism, which pulls these in?
$ rpm -q --recommends python-pip-wheel
(libcrypt.so.1 if python3(x86-32))
(libcrypt.so.1()(64bit) if python3(x86-64))
The comment in spec:
# Some manylinux1 wheels need libcrypt.so.1.
# Manylinux1, a common (as of 2019) platform tag for binary wheels, relies
# on a glibc version that included ancient crypto functions, which were
# moved to libxcrypt and then removed in:
#
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FullyRemoveDeprecatedAndUnsafeFunctionsFromLibcrypt
# The manylinux1 standard assumed glibc would keep ABI compatibility,
# but that's only the case if libcrypt.so.1 (libxcrypt-compat) is around.
# This should be solved in the next manylinux standard (but it may be
# a long time until manylinux1 is phased out).
# See: https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/issues/305
# Note that manylinux is only applicable to x86 (both 32 and 64 bits)
I wonder if manylinux1 is still applicable to Python 3.12. Will check.
https://discuss.python.org/t/is-it-safe-to-assume-that-manylinux1-and-python-3-12-will-never-be-combined/29455
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
