Hi Vit On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 10:38 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have recently installed Fedora Rawhide via netinstall and there are > some questionable packages installed by default, such as: > > cpp > libtomcrypt > libxcrypt-compat > exiv2 > > and I wonder what is the mechanism, which pulls these in? For example, > there is not much what would depend on cpp: > > ~~~ > $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatdepends cpp > Updating and loading repositories: > Repositories loaded. > NsCDE-0:2.2-2.fc38.x86_64 > buildah-0:1.30.0-1.fc39.x86_64 > calendar-0:1.37-7.20211220cvs.fc37.x86_64 > gcc-0:13.1.1-4.fc39.x86_64 > xrdb-0:1.2.1-5.fc38.x86_64 > ~~~ > > > I can't see it in comps: > > > ~~~ > $ grep -R cpp > comps-f16.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f16.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cpphs</packagereq> > comps-f15.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f15.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cpphs</packagereq> > comps-f8.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f11.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f11.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cpphs</packagereq> > comps-f18.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f7.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f12.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f12.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cpphs</packagereq> > comps-f9.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f17.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f17.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cpphs</packagereq> > comps-f13.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f13.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cpphs</packagereq> > comps-f14.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > comps-f14.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cpphs</packagereq> > comps-f10.xml.in: <packagereq type="optional">cppunit</packagereq> > grep: > .git/objects/pack/pack-8b71ed94572d14e6f4922239550f2e605ead175b.pack: > binární soubor odpovídá > grep: > .git/objects/pack/pack-e5b1b3c9ad6241515210e06736de0317714d0810.pack: > binární soubor odpovídá > comps-eln.xml.in.in: <packagereq > type="default">cppunit-devel</packagereq> > comps-eln.xml.in.in: <packagereq type="default" > arch="x86_64">mingw32-cpp</packagereq> > comps-eln.xml.in.in: <packagereq type="default" > arch="x86_64">mingw64-cpp</packagereq> > comps-eln.xml.in.in: <packagereq type="default">ocaml-cppo</packagereq> > comps-eln.xml.in.in: <packagereq > type="default">poppler-cpp</packagereq> > comps-eln.xml.in.in: <packagereq > type="default">poppler-cpp-devel</packagereq> > > ~~~ > > > I can't see it in kickstarts: > > > ~~~ > $ grep -R cpp > custom/fedora-livedvd-haskell.ks:cpphs > > ~~~ > > > So what is the mechanism these are installed? Where I can report this? Can't comment on all the packages you listed, but the C preprocessor (CPP) is indeed required by xrdb (that's an option in xrdb, see "-cpp" in man xrdb) and xrdb itself is required by GDM: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/blob/rawhide/f/gdm.spec#_80 GDM uses xrdb from its data/Init.in and data/Xsession.in: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Xsession.in#L118-129 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Init.in#L31-34 Please note that these commands all use "xrdb -nocpp" so cpp is not actually used there, but the package dependencies still pull it of course. HTH Cheers Olivier _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
