On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 12:43, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 5:41 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > >> > Wouldn't it be better to just update OpenCascade to its new upstream version in that sidetag as well instead of doing a compat package for it? >> >> Define better. >> To be clear, I'm not "doing a compat package" for it. I'm just >> changing one line in the spec file and rebuilding it against >> tbb2020.3-devel (which is currently identical to tbb-devel). >> That just means the OpenCascade package in rawhide won't be broken >> when tbb gets updated. >> >> > The new OpenCascade actually requires the new TBB and can't be built with the older version. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217295. >> >> Yes, I'm aware of the bugzilla (it's blocked by #2036372 which is this change). > > > There's no guarantee that the new version won't have new issues and not be a simple update and rebuild. I don't want to hold things up. Yeah, that's what I figured. > For that reason I'm good with the plan as is. Once things have settled in Rawhide I can do test builds of the new version with latest TBB. OK, thanks for confirming! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
