On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 10:27 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > Assuming those "binary compatible distributions" choose to add > > LibreOffice back in and support it, given what they actually do in > > terms of actual development it's actually pretty unlikely they're > > going to do all the extra work to add back an office suite and all the > > dependencies it requires. > > If LibreOffice remains maintained in Fedora (and I sure hope so, because > otherwise that would definitely make Fedora useless for me), there is a good > chance that somebody will request and maintain EPEL branches for it, as has > already been done for the KDE Plasma and KDE Gear applications stack. Someone doing work in EPEL is quite a bit different to my point of a corporate organisation downstream of RHEL adding value and differentiation that Red Hat doesn't provide as part of RHEL. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
