On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 9:00 AM Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/06/30 21:14: > > Since its review, rubygem-rdiscount was clasified as ASL 1.1, but as far as I can tell, it was always BSD licensed. Therefore I have changed the license tag to BSD-3-Clause which should be in line with upstream: > > > > https://github.com/davidfstr/rdiscount/blob/8c890c56cecaa85cebe671d12f4724215876062c/rdiscount.gemspec#L8 > > > > https://github.com/davidfstr/rdiscount/blob/8c890c56cecaa85cebe671d12f4724215876062c/COPYING > > > > > > Vít > > > > Well, actually the initial import of rubygem-rdiscount seems > version 1.6.3.2, and it seems its COPYING was actually more > Apache-1.1-like than BSD-4-Clause, so I can understand that > the initial packager labeled this as ASL-1.1, ref: > > https://github.com/davidfstr/rdiscount/blob/5efa97de9fc4874635a59d3f7835b831749da1e1/COPYING > https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1 > > Anyway I agree that current license is under BSD-3-Clause, license changed with > 2.1.6: > https://github.com/davidfstr/rdiscount/commit/78de75c515bb8c93d1842e6448868a8ff087d5a2 I am pretty sure this is not a match to BSD-3-Clause as currently specified by SPDX but I have submitted an issue about this: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2020 Richard _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
